Month: February 2026

Our recent Critical Thinking session was very interesting and meaningful. It was not just about learning concepts, but about questioning our own beliefs and thinking more deeply.

Nisarg Sohitra Sir conducted the session in a very calm and open manner. He created a safe and respectful space where everyone felt comfortable sharing their opinions, even on sensitive topics like the existence of God, personal beliefs, and moral differences. What I appreciated the most was that he respected every viewpoint without judging anyone, while also encouraging us to think more deeply.

We learned about the idea of the cognitive miser, which explains how our brain often takes shortcuts to save effort. We also discussed cognitive load and how stress or too much information can affect our thinking and decisions. These ideas helped us understand why we sometimes form biases and make quick assumptions.

The case study of the “Lariat of Hyena” in Malawi helped us apply different ethical theories like moral reasoning, moral relativism, self-interest theory, deontology, and utilitarianism. Each theory helped us look at the situation from a different point of view and showed us that moral decisions are not always simple.

Overall, the session helped us improve our critical thinking skills, respect different opinions, and see situations from multiple perspectives. Thank you to Nisarg Sir for conducting such a thoughtful and impactful session.

Critical Thinking session was truly enriching and thought-provoking. It was not just about learning theories, but about challenging our own beliefs, biases, and assumptions.
Nisarg Sir conducted the session with remarkable calmness and openness. He created a respectful environment where everyone felt comfortable sharing their perspectives—even on sensitive topics like the existence of God, personal beliefs, and moral differences.
One of the most interesting concepts we explored was the idea of the cognitive miser—how our brain often takes shortcuts to save mental energy. Along with this, we discussed cognitive load and how pressure or complexity can affect our thinking and decision-making. These ideas helped us understand why biases form and how easily we rely on assumptions instead of careful reasoning.
The case study of the “Lariat of Hyena” in Malawi pushed us to apply different ethical theories like moral reasoning, moral relativism, self-interest theory, deontology, and utilitarianism. Each theory gave us a different lens to evaluate the situation, showing that moral decisions are rarely simple or one-sided.
Overall, the session strengthened our ability to think critically, respect diverse opinions, and analyze situations from multiple perspectives.

Another powerful segment focused on emotionally charged topics — politics, religion, gender, caste, identity, discipline, and freedom of speech. Identifying which topics instantly make us defensive or emotional was an eye-opening exercise. It highlighted how emotions can influence reasoning and how self-awareness is essential for fair and balanced thinking. These discussions required maturity, respect, and openness within the group, which made the learning environment intellectually safe yet challenging.

I also appreciated how we expressed our understanding through art by creating sketchnotes. Translating abstract ideas into visual representations helped consolidate learning in a creative and reflective way. The debate on the political conflict of Kashmir further pushed us to move beyond personal opinions and examine perspectives, narratives, and biases critically. It was not about choosing sides, but about understanding complexity.

Overall, the workshop has been thought-provoking and transformative. It has encouraged me to be more mindful of my cognitive biases, more comfortable with discomfort, and more responsible in the way I engage with information and discussions —as a learner.

Last two sessions turned out to be far more fruitful than I had anticipated—it was one of those rare learning experiences that stays with you long after it ends. I was introduced to several new and thought-provoking concepts, such as the placebo effect and the Trolley Experiment, which immediately made me question how often our decisions are influenced by assumptions, emotions, and unseen psychological factors rather than pure logic.

What stood out most was the real-life application of critical thinking. Through discussions, examples, and active participation, it became clear how essential critical thinking is in our daily lives—whether we are reading articles, forming opinions, or engaging in conversations on complex issues. The debate around the Kashmir situation was particularly impactful. It challenged me to look beyond headlines, recognize biases, evaluate multiple perspectives, and understand how narratives are shaped.

This session was truly an eye-opener. It made me more aware of how easily we can accept information at face value and how important it is to pause, question, and reflect before forming judgments. I walked away with a deeper appreciation for thoughtful analysis and respectful debate. Overall, I thoroughly enjoyed the session and genuinely look forward to applying these insights in my everyday thinking and learning journey.

Today’s class was engaging and thought-provoking. We analyzed a real-world case using critical thinking and moral reasoning, focusing on evidence, assumptions, and different perspectives rather than emotions. Group discussions highlighted that complex issues are rarely black and white. Overall, the session improved our logical thinking, respectful communication, and balanced approach to sensitive topics.