Insights from Life Sessions (ETA): Discovering the Strength of Analytical Thinking

The life class gave me a chance to slow down and reflect on how I process my thoughts. We examined two ways our minds function—one quick and reactive, the other slower and more deliberate. It helped me recognise the difference between automatic responses and thoughtful decisions.
I also got clearer about the differences between belief, opinion, and fact. That’s something I hadn’t thought deeply about before, and now I’m realising how easily we confuse them. Biases play a huge role, too, often without us noticing.
Watching The Truman Show added another layer. I saw how routine, fear, and outside influence can quietly shape our choices. It made me think about whether I’m questioning things enough—or just going along with what feels familiar.
Overall, the class pushed me to be more aware of my thought patterns. It’s not just about knowing concepts—it’s about seeing how they show up in daily life, and deciding for myself what’s worth rethinking.

Life Class Reflections (ETA): Unlocking the Power of Critical Thinking

This week’s Life Class turned out to be a thought-provoking journey into the heart of something we often take for granted—our own thinking.

The theme was “Critical Thinking”, a skill that may sound academic but plays a vital role in how we understand the world, make decisions, and shape our beliefs. Through a mix of theory, real-life examples, engaging conversations, and a powerful film, we explored what it truly means to think critically in today’s information-saturated world.

What is Critical Thinking?

At its core, critical thinking is the ability to think clearly and rationally, understanding the logical connection between ideas. It’s about asking questions, challenging assumptions, and not accepting information at face value.

We began by exploring a simple yet powerful definition:

> “Critical thinking is the art of analyzing and evaluating thinking with a view to improving it.”

Fear, Opinions, Beliefs & Facts

To truly understand critical thinking, we dove into some interconnected concepts:

Fear: We discussed how fear can often cloud judgment and prevent us from asking the right questions. Sometimes, the fear of being wrong or challenging authority silences our inner skeptic.

Opinions vs. Beliefs vs. Facts: A central part of the discussion revolved around distinguishing these three. We reflected on how opinions are personal views, beliefs are often long-held and emotionally rooted, and facts are objective truths. Understanding the difference helps us navigate debates and disagreements with more clarity and respect.

Gullibility vs. Skepticism: Where do we draw the line between being open-minded and being easily misled? We examined the importance of healthy skepticism—not to dismiss everything, but to question and verify. A well-exercised mind doesn’t jump to conclusions, nor does it blindly accept every claim.

Sharing and Perspectives:

The most enriching part of the session was hearing thoughts and reflections from different people. Real-life examples brought depth to the theory—how we form beliefs based on upbringing, how media influences opinions, or how peer pressure sometimes overrides logic.

These conversations reminded us that critical thinking is not just an intellectual exercise—it’s deeply personal and often emotional

The Truman Show:

To bring the concept alive, we watched “The Truman Show”—a film that couldn’t be more relevant to the topic. Truman lives in a constructed reality, unaware that his world is scripted. As he starts questioning everything around him, he embarks on a journey toward truth.

The film sparked powerful reflections:

1) How much of our reality is shaped by others?

2) What role does questioning play in our freedom?

3) Are we living authentically—or just accepting the version of life handed to us?

Truman’s courage to challenge his reality served as a metaphor for our own lives. It asked us: what are we not questioning enough?

Key Takeaways:

1. Critical thinking is not about always being right—it’s about being willing to examine, question, and grow.

2. We need to recognize the influence of fear, emotion, and external narratives on our thinking.

3. Facts, opinions, and beliefs are not interchangeable—and confusing them can lead to poor decisions.

4. Being skeptical is healthy; being gullible is not.

5. Sometimes, truth demands discomfort but it also leads to growth and freedom.

Tru(e)man or Not? Escaping the Show of Shoulds

Today marked Day 2 of our Critical Thinking class – Day 1 for me, technically, since I missed yesterday’s session. We began with a much-needed recap and explored foundational concepts like opinion, belief, attitude, and their subtle yet significant differences. Two powerful words emerged: skepticism and gullibility. Little did I know, these weren’t just vocabulary words – they were lenses I’d need for what came next.

We watched The Truman Show.

I had seen this movie years ago, but watching it again now – with the weight of lived experience – felt like I was watching an entirely different film. Or perhaps, for the first time, I was watching myself.

Truman’s world is controlled – constructed meticulously to keep him safe, compliant, and content. As I observed his arc, I couldn’t help but reflect on my own internal “producers”: beliefs and fears that script how I behave in areas like religion, relationships, and career. How many decisions have I made because of comfort, or worse, control disguised as comfort?

But amidst all the artificiality in Truman’s world, love cut through like a glitch in the matrix. That one sincere connection – free of the show’s control – planted the first seed of doubt in him. Isn’t that how it works for us too? One real connection, one truthful moment, and the whole illusion starts to crack.

The ending stayed with me long after the screen went black. As Truman walks off the set, reclaiming his autonomy, the two security guards casually ask, “What else is on?”
That line hit hard.

How often do we live in fear of being judged, controlled, or watched? But people only stay tuned in if we keep broadcasting. When we stop performing, they stop watching. And maybe – just maybe – that’s not a bad thing.

Today’s class didn’t just teach me terms. It asked me to question the set I might be unknowingly living on. And I’m now more curious than ever about the sessions ahead.

The real question is:
Am I the star of my life, or just another actor in someone else’s script?

Another blog re:life classes CT-ETA

This year it’s in July, Life classes, there it is, a moment to reflect, a moment to pause and think, thinking about how to think. So is that metacognition? Maybe.

We started these sessions by understanding system 1 and system 2 (our subconscious and conscious minds). We then had diverse opinions on various claims which were mind opening, thought provoking and really unintuitive.But I guess that is what critical thinking is about, hopefully as time passes this process also might be done by my system 1.

While using my system 2 to the words for the blog I can understand what cognitive load is.We also learnt about various biases and how they affect our rationality.

Then a movie was shown in which we could connect it with a few parallels from our own world on what limits us to explore more, what is true, what are inherited beliefs and how outside influences control our lives.

All in all I enjoyed it and am excited for day 3.

Reflecting on Critical Thinking: Lessons from Life, Brain Science, and “The Truman Show”

From Thought to Action: The Role of Critical Thinking in Decision-Making

In our daily lives, we often face decisions that seem straightforward at first glance, but when we take a moment to think deeply, we realize that these choices come with layers of complexities. This is where critical thinking plays a vital role. Throughout my critical thinking class, I’ve learned that the ability to carefully evaluate, analyze, and make decisions isn’t just reserved for academic problems. It’s a skill that carries over into real-world situations, especially when personal, moral, and ethical dilemmas arise.

Critical thinking is much more than just problem-solving—it’s about taking a step back, looking at the bigger picture, and questioning assumptions. It involves a systematic evaluation of all available information, weighing the pros and cons, and considering long-term consequences. For instance, when faced with a decision, critical thinking requires asking: What do I know? What are my biases? What are the potential outcomes of my choice?

What I’ve Learned in Critical Thinking Class

Reflecting on my experiences in the critical thinking class, here are some key takeaways that have shaped my approach to decision-making:

  1. Questioning Assumptions: I learned that our initial reactions are often shaped by biases or assumptions. By pausing and questioning the basis of our beliefs, we open the door to new possibilities and solutions.
  2. Considering Multiple Perspectives: One of the most valuable lessons was learning to look at a situation from different viewpoints. This doesn’t just involve listening to others but actively engaging with their reasoning. It’s about understanding the why behind different opinions, which helps build empathy and makes us better decision-makers.
  3. Evaluating Evidence: Critical thinking isn’t just about opinions; it’s about evidence. Whether you’re evaluating news, arguments, or decisions at work, it’s crucial to ask, “What’s the evidence to support this claim?” This is where fact-checking and logical reasoning come into play, ensuring that decisions are made based on facts, not emotions or assumptions.
  4. Making Informed Decisions: Critical thinking has taught me that decisions should be based on logic, reasoning, and available evidence rather than impulse or convenience. In fact, the more we practice thinking critically, the more we can avoid poor decisions driven by biases or faulty logic.
  5. Understanding the Consequences: Every decision we make has consequences—some immediate and others that unfold over time. Critical thinking pushes us to anticipate potential outcomes and weigh the long-term impact of our actions, both on ourselves and on others.

Real-World Application of Critical Thinking

The lessons from the class aren’t just theoretical. They can be applied in everyday situations—whether it’s resolving a dispute with a colleague, deciding how to invest time and resources into a project, or even making personal choices about relationships. Critical thinking helps you assess the pros and cons, consider your personal values, and evaluate the long-term impact of each choice.Critical thinking is not just a classroom skill; it’s a lifelong practice that influences the decisions we make and the way we view the world. It challenges us to be more thoughtful, reflective, and aware of the impact of our choices. Whether we’re navigating moral dilemmas, conflicts, or everyday decisions, critical thinking enables us to approach situations with clarity and confidence. The lessons I’ve learned in critical thinking class have fundamentally changed the way I make decisions—helping me to consider multiple perspectives, analyze evidence, and choose actions that are not just logical, but also ethically sound. It’s a process that will continue to guide me, ensuring that I make more informed, balanced, and responsible decisions in all aspects of my life.

Critical thinking Day7 -Ethical dilemmas

IN day 7 critical thinking class we undersatnd about The Trolley Problem: A Simple Guide to Thinking EthicallyHave you ever faced a tough choice where no option seems entirely right? The trolley problem is a famous thought experiment that challenges how we make moral decisions. by Trolley problem we understand sometimes it isn’t easy to decide what is ethically right.There are different ways to face ethical dilemmas People approach this dilemma in different ways
Moral Reasoning: The process of thinking through right and wrong in a situation.
Moral Relativism: The idea that morality depends on cultural or individual perspectives.
Self-Interest Theory: Suggests that people make moral choices based on personal benefit.
Deontology: Focuses on following moral rules and duties, regardless of consequences.
Utilitarianism: Aims to maximize overall happiness by choosing the action with the best outcome.
Rule Utilitarianism: This approach focuses on following rules that lead to the greatest good instead of judging individual actions.
my learning from day 7 class was-
Understand different ethical viewpoints.
Think more critically about consequences.
Recognize our personal biases.
Make more informed moral decisions.

Critical Thinking…

जीवन कठिन निर्णयों से भरा है, किसी की भावनाओं की रक्षा के लिए एक छोटा सा झूठ बोलने से लेकर लाभ और पर्यावरणीय प्रभाव को संतुलित करने तक.नैतिक सिद्धांत हमें इन दुविधाओं से निपटने में मदद करते हैं. Moral relativism बताता है कि सही और गलत सांस्कृतिक मान्यताओं पर निर्भर करता है, जबकि self-interest theory का तर्क है कि लोग अपने लाभ के लिए कार्य करते हैं, हालांकि हमेशा स्वार्थी नहीं. Deontology का तर्क है कि लोग following strict rules, सख्त नियमों के पालन पर जोर दिया जाता है, जबकि utilitarianism बहुसंख्यकों के लिए खुशी को अधिकतम करने पर ध्यान केंद्रित करता है. Rule utilitarianism ऐसे नियमों की वकालत करता है जो आम तौर पर सर्वोत्तम परिणामों की ओर ले जाते हैं। इन सिद्धांतों को समझना हमारी आलोचनात्मक सोच को बढ़ाता है, which gives us different perspectives देखने और निष्पक्ष, सूचित निर्णय लेने में मदद मिलती है.

Critical Thinking Day 7: Ethical dilemmas

We started with prioritizing our stand on our moral values where initially five scenarios were given to us which all of us found a little easy to do but things changed as soon as more 5 examples were added into the list which really made us self-introspect. We toggled a lot among these and took a while to make our list of priorities on moral values.
Then we were introduced to the trolley problem and were asked to read an article, both of them again challenged our previous selection of moral values and ethics.
We also discussed about the ethical dilemmas like moral reasoning, moral relativism, Deontology, Utilitarianism, and self utilitarianism where each one of us asked to define them, share real-life examples and the issues with each of these ethical dilemmas. We were also asked to share our opinions about a few cases where we found that an individual’s decision making was not only affected by the emotional parameter, but also by the cultural, societal, and regional parameters in play.
The session was thought provoking from the very beginning and kept on questioning about our moral values throughout but I think this entire practice was fruitful in making all of us more receptive and more openminded.

The Dilemma of Emotional vs. Critical Quotient

One of the biggest challenges I face is deciding when to rely on my emotional quotient (EQ) and when to tap into my critical thinking skills (CQ). As someone who is naturally empathetic, I often lean towards emotional responses in situations that require compassion and care. This can be a strength in my work as an educator where understanding others’ emotions and supporting them is key. However, there are moments where my emotional instincts may cloud my judgment, especially when I need to make objective decisions. The dilemma often arises between staying true to my emotions and considering what logic dictates. The process of strengthening my critical mindset is ongoing. It’s not about abandoning emotions but learning how to integrate them with logic. Living with a dual perspective of both emotional and critical thinking is not easy, but it’s a balance I am learning to navigate each day. While I excel at understanding and responding to emotions, I recognize the need to sharpen my critical thinking skills to make more informed, objective decisions. By continuing to explore this balance, I can build a life that not only honors my empathy but also empowers me to manage time, responsibilities, and personal growth with clarity and purpose.
1 2 3 31