God, Genders, and the Great ‘What If?’ – Thinking Critically About Belief

Day 5 and 6 of our Critical Thinking class took us into a territory where logic meets faith – religion. A topic that’s as ancient as it is personal, and yet, often left unexamined.

One of the sessions was led by Vardan Kabra, who openly identifies as an atheist. He didn’t try to convert or convince – rather, he invited us to question: Why do we believe what we believe? Are we following faith out of genuine conviction or inherited habit? While I found the session interesting, it skimmed only the surface of what I was hoping for. I wanted a deeper exploration – not just of religious practice, but of God’s very existence. Still, the discussion nudged me to reflect on the rituals I perform almost mechanically, maybe as a subconscious transaction – “I’ll do this, God, if you do that.”

The next day, we read Vardan sir’s blog about his journey from a confused theist to an atheist. It was less about disbelief and more about discovery – peeling away layers of assumption. Then came The Man from Earth – a movie that turned the idea of religion into a thought experiment. When the protagonist, John, claims he was Jesus trying to teach Buddha’s principles, it wasn’t offensive; it was fascinating. Like the college girl in the movie, I listened with curiosity, open to the possibility that belief could be both beautiful and constructed at the same time. I didn’t feel triggered like Edith; maybe that’s because I’ve learned to sit comfortably in uncertainty.

Our final discussion turned toward religion and gender. Within Hinduism, I realized there’s comparatively less structural inequality. Yet in Christianity, verses like “wives, submit to your husbands” have been misinterpreted to justify submission – a reminder that sacred texts are powerful, but people’s interpretations often decide how that power is used.

These two days weren’t about proving or disproving religion. They were about sharpening the tool of questioning – to separate faith from fear, tradition from truth.

Maybe the real critical thinking test isn’t about whether we believe in God.
Maybe it’s about whether we believe thoughtfully.

Critical Thinking:ETA: Day 5&6

Over the past two days, we’ve delved into some deeply intriguing topics — God, religion, faith, and spirituality. These conversations opened up perspectives I had never truly considered before. Alongside our discussions, we watched the film “The Man from Earth,” a movie that left many of us questioning long-held beliefs and assumptions. It wasn’t just another classroom activity — it was an experience that challenged the very foundation of what we think we know.

What struck me most was how this kind of open, reflective space exists here at Fountainhead School. It’s rare to be part of an environment where we can freely question, debate, and explore ideas that often go unspoken. The discussions and the movie together stirred something within me — a curiosity to dig deeper into my own religion, as well as others, to truly understand why I believe what I do.

Am I a firm believer? A casual one? An agnostic or even an atheist in the making? These are questions that surfaced as we explored different perspectives — from unwavering faith to uncertainty and doubt.

This experience has inspired me not just to accept my beliefs at face value, but to question them, research more, and arrive at my own understanding. It’s the beginning of a personal journey — one that’s both unsettling and enlightening

Tru(e)man or Not? Escaping the Show of Shoulds

Today marked Day 2 of our Critical Thinking class – Day 1 for me, technically, since I missed yesterday’s session. We began with a much-needed recap and explored foundational concepts like opinion, belief, attitude, and their subtle yet significant differences. Two powerful words emerged: skepticism and gullibility. Little did I know, these weren’t just vocabulary words – they were lenses I’d need for what came next.

We watched The Truman Show.

I had seen this movie years ago, but watching it again now – with the weight of lived experience – felt like I was watching an entirely different film. Or perhaps, for the first time, I was watching myself.

Truman’s world is controlled – constructed meticulously to keep him safe, compliant, and content. As I observed his arc, I couldn’t help but reflect on my own internal “producers”: beliefs and fears that script how I behave in areas like religion, relationships, and career. How many decisions have I made because of comfort, or worse, control disguised as comfort?

But amidst all the artificiality in Truman’s world, love cut through like a glitch in the matrix. That one sincere connection – free of the show’s control – planted the first seed of doubt in him. Isn’t that how it works for us too? One real connection, one truthful moment, and the whole illusion starts to crack.

The ending stayed with me long after the screen went black. As Truman walks off the set, reclaiming his autonomy, the two security guards casually ask, “What else is on?”
That line hit hard.

How often do we live in fear of being judged, controlled, or watched? But people only stay tuned in if we keep broadcasting. When we stop performing, they stop watching. And maybe – just maybe – that’s not a bad thing.

Today’s class didn’t just teach me terms. It asked me to question the set I might be unknowingly living on. And I’m now more curious than ever about the sessions ahead.

The real question is:
Am I the star of my life, or just another actor in someone else’s script?