AI – Day 2

I learn about manging mails through, google studio and manage data in spreed sheet which will help me in daily work.

AI workflows (આર્ટિફિશિયલ ઇન્ટેલિજન્સ વર્કફ્લો) એ એવી પ્રક્રિયાઓ છે જેમાં AI ટેક્નોલોજી, મશીન લર્નિંગ એલ્ગોરિધમ્સ અને ઓટોમેશન ટૂલ્સનો ઉપયોગ કરીને કોઈપણ કાર્ય કે પ્રક્રિયાને ઓટોમેટિક, ઝડપી અને કાર્યક્ષમ બનાવવામાં આવે છે.

  • ડેટા પ્રોસેસિંગ (Data Processing): આ વર્કફ્લોમાં રો ડેટાને AI દ્વારા કલેક્ટ, ક્લીન અને એનાલાઈઝ કરવામાં આવે છે, જેનાથી સેકન્ડોમાં સચોટ માહિતી મળી જાય છે.
  • ઓટોમેશન (Automation): આ વારંવાર થતા અને વધુ સમય લેતા કામો—જેમ કે ઈમેલ રાઉટિંગ, ઈનવોઈસ પ્રોસેસિંગ, અથવા કસ્ટમર ક્વેરીઝના જવાબ આપવા—તેને આપોઆપ પૂર્ણ કરે છે.
  • સ્માર્ટ ડિસિઝન મેકિંગ (Smart Decision Making): મશીન લર્નિંગ મોડલ્સ જૂના ડેટાના આધારે ભવિષ્યના ટ્રેન્ડ્સનું અનુમાન લગાવે છે અને વધુ સ્માર્ટ બિઝનેસ નિર્ણયો લેવામાં મદદ કરે છે.
  • ઇન્ટિગ્રેશન (Integrations): AI વર્કફ્લોને પહેલાથી ચાલતા સોફ્ટવેર (જેમ કે CRM, ERP, અથવા HR સિસ્ટમ્સ) સાથે સરળતાથી જોડી (integrate કરી) શકાય છે.
  • હ્યુમન-ઈન-ધ-લૂપ (Human-in-the-Loop): આમાં AI અઘરું વિશ્લેષણાત્મક કામ કરે છે, જ્યારે માણસો માત્ર અંતિમ રિવ્યૂ અથવા જટિલ વ્યૂહરચનાઓ પર ધ્યાન આપે છે.
  • ફાયદા (Benefits): AI વર્કફ્લોથી બિઝનેસની પ્રોડક્ટિવિટી વધે છે, ખર્ચ અને ભૂલો ઘટે છે, અને કામ કરવાની ઝડપ ઘણી ગણી વધી જાય છે.

Day 1&2

This session helped me understand that our actions, responses, and relationships are deeply connected to our awareness of self and others. Concepts like the marshmallow experiment made me reflect on patience and delayed gratification—not just in students, but in myself. It reminded me that meaningful outcomes often require us to pause and wait rather than react instantly.

The Johari Window pushed me to think beyond what I already know about myself. It highlighted that there are parts of me that others can see but I may not be aware of. This made me realise the importance of feedback and openness in both personal and professional growth.

I realised that I don’t always pause. In many situations, especially in a fast-paced classroom, I tend to respond quickly. The idea of “pause, respond, reflect” made me question my own practice. Am I reacting out of habit, or am I responding with intention?

The concept of amygdala hijack particularly stood out to me. It gave me language to describe moments when emotions take over and responses become impulsive. I could relate to situations where I may have reacted quickly instead of thoughtfully. This awareness made me reflect on how I can better regulate my responses.

One of the strongest takeaways for me was the idea of psychological safety. I began to think about my classroom environment—not just as a place for learning, but as a space where students feel safe to express themselves, make mistakes, and take risks. I realised that learning cannot truly happen unless students feel emotionally secure.

The idea of leadership response also made me reflect on my role as a teacher. Leadership is not just about instruction; it is about how I respond in challenging moments. My reactions set the tone for the classroom, and I have the responsibility to model calm, thoughtful, and respectful behaviour.

Going forward, I want to consciously practice pausing before responding. Even a small pause can help me move from an emotional reaction to a thoughtful response.I also want to be more open to feedback, to reduce my blind spots as highlighted in the Johari Window.

Creating psychological safety in my classroom will be a priority, ensuring that every student feels heard and valued.Most importantly, I want to build awareness—of my thoughts, my emotions, and my responses. Because I now understand that awareness is the first step towards meaningful change.

This session did not just introduce new concepts; it shifted my perspective. It reminded me that effective teaching is not only about strategies and content, but also about self-awareness, emotional regulation, and the environment we create for our learners.

AI Workshop Reflection

AI depends on the prompt we give. At the end human thinking and verification is at the center

We learned how to apply PACE format while giving prompt

What We Learned in the Google Workspace Studio Workshop

The workshop gave us a practical understanding of how Google Workspace Studio and Gemini can be used to automate repetitive tasks and make everyday work more efficient.

We learned how to create workflows that can analyze information, apply specific conditions, and notify us only when something important requires attention. For example, instead of manually checking daily emails, AI can help identify relevant messages and send focused notifications through Google Chat.

Overall, the workshop showed us how automation + AI can reduce repetitive work, save time, minimize information overload, and help us focus on tasks that need human attention.

Reflection of Critical Thinking – Day 1 & 2

As a frequent practitioner of critical thinking, I thoroughly relished participating in highly stimulating discussions over the course of 2 days. The classes were efficiently structured and were well-paced, which ensured consistent engagement. I got to develop a greater appreciation and nuanced understanding of the concept through various strategies and activities.

Firstly, we got to learn 2 kinds of systems thinking, namely, reflexive and reflective, which we closely examined and identified a common human tendency to react without preliminary introspection. We were further encouraged to deliberate and consider various perspectives before responding to a certain scenario. Subsequently, we were introduced to four thinking mindsets, namely, preacher, prosecutor, politician and scientist, along with their traits. We discussed how, in different scenarios, we adopt one of these mindsets, and we were later encouraged to deliberately try to practice the ‘scientist’ mindset.

Additionally, we mulled over the difference between truth and facts, which ensured further clarity. We later confronted our cognitive illusions and put our critical thinking to the test by finding contradictory evidence to the beliefs that we held most strongly.

Overall, these were highly engaging and intellectually stimulating sessions, which have equipped me with a better understanding of the application of critical thinking!

Book club

Our Life Class – Book Club was a meaningful opportunity to reflect on life, experiences, and personal growth. Over two days, we explored Before the Coffee Gets Cold by Toshikazu Kawaguchi and reflected on how our past shapes who we are.

We discussed how we cannot change the past, but we can change how we understand and learn from it. Remarkably Bright Creatures helped deepen this idea by highlighting the power of perspective.

On the second day, The Boy, the Mole, the Fox and the Horse encouraged us to reflect on how our experiences, challenges, and relationships shape us and help us navigate the present and future.

Loopholes

Both The Lake House and Toshikazu Kawaguchi’s Before the Coffee Gets Cold use an unusual form of communication between people separated by time. In The Lake House, Kate and Alex exchange letters through a magical mailbox, allowing them to communicate across two different years. In Before the Coffee Gets Cold, people can travel briefly into the past from a particular chair in a café. Although both stories use time travel to explore love, memory and missed opportunities, they treat the logic of time very differently.

One of the biggest problems in The Lake House is the apparent contradiction surrounding Alex’s death. At one point, Alex is shown dying in Kate’s arms, and his brother later tells Kate that Alex died two years earlier on Valentine’s Day. Yet Alex eventually receives Kate’s message telling him not to come and is saved, allowing them to meet at the end. This raises an obvious question: if Alex was saved, then who was the Alex who died in Kate’s arms earlier? The film seems to depend on the idea that the future can be rewritten, but it does not clearly explain what happens to the original timeline. The emotional ending works, but the logic becomes difficult to defend.

Before the Coffee Gets Cold has a different kind of loophole. In the story of the husband and wife, the wife travels to the past because she wants to know what is written in the letter her husband has been carrying. However, the letter already exists in the present, inside his portfolio. She could simply read it. Since the rules of the café state that travelling to the past cannot change the present, the contents of the letter should remain exactly the same. Her decision to travel therefore seems unnecessary from a practical point of view.

However, this difference reveals something important about the two works. The Lake House uses time travel mainly to create a romantic mystery and ultimately depends on changing the timeline. Before the Coffee Gets Cold uses time travel less as a logical mechanism and more as an emotional experience. The wife does not really need information; she needs the experience of hearing from her husband and understanding what his words mean to him. In both works, therefore, the emotional truth is stronger than the temporal logic. The stories remind us that sometimes people do not travel through time because they need to change the past. They travel because they need to understand what they could not understand in the present.

Day 2 :Tejas Patel

Today, I learned how to assign tasks to the concerned team members so that when we receive an unwanted or irrelevant email or message, it can be easily forwarded to the right person instead of spending unnecessary time handling it myself.

I also learned how emails can be synchronized with important tasks and converted into a to-do list. In addition, urgent emails can be highlighted and notified through chat, which makes it much easier to prioritize and take quick action.

This is very useful for me because, most of the time, I receive emails that are not directly related to my work. Earlier, I had to read the email, understand the context, forward it to the concerned person, and then follow up with them. Now, with what I learned today, this entire process can be made much faster and more efficient.

Overall, today’s AI workshop was very useful for me. I learned something practical and unique that I can directly apply to my daily work, especially for managing emails, tasks, and follow-ups more efficiently.

Emotional Intelligence(Beta) – Day 1 & 2

Days 1 and 2 of Life Class were engaging and insightful, helping us understand our emotions, reactions, and behaviour. One of the most interesting topics was amygdala hijack, which explained why we sometimes react emotionally without thinking. We also explored impulse control and learned the importance of taking a pause before responding. The RAIN technique helped us understand how to recognise, allow, investigate, and nurture our emotions. We learned that pausing gives us time to understand our feelings and choose a better response. These concepts encouraged us to reflect on our reactions and focus on personal growth.

Another key learning was about the qualities of a good leader and what makes leadership effective. We discussed the importance of communication, empathy, listening, motivation, responsibility, and understanding others. The SBI feedback method taught us how to give feedback by focusing on the Situation, Behaviour, and Impact. This helped us understand how feedback can be specific, constructive, and meaningful. We also explored the idea of “pause, understand and grow”, which can help us become more self-aware and thoughtful in our interactions. These learnings showed us that good leadership begins with understanding ourselves and then supporting others.

The activities made the learning more practical and enjoyable. The role plays showed us how people often react immediately without taking a pause and how the outcome can change when we respond thoughtfully. The tower-building game was another fun activity that demonstrated the importance of teamwork and leadership. Leaders had to guide, motivate, and encourage their team members to build the tower successfully. It showed us that a good leader does not simply give instructions but inspires and supports the team. Overall, the two days were a valuable experience that combined learning, reflection, teamwork, and fun.

#EI + People Management

Emotional Intelligence

The Leader in the Mirror: Why Emotional Intelligence Beats IQ in the Classroom and Boardroom

Walk into any staffroom, any office, any team huddle — and you’ll find two kinds of leaders. One reacts. The other responds. The difference between them isn’t intelligence, experience, or even confidence. It’s emotional intelligence (EQ) — the quiet skill of understanding yourself and reading the room before you open your mouth.

Here are four powerful, research-backed tools that separate reactive managers from genuinely effective leaders.


1. The Amygdala Hijack: When Your Brain Betrays You

Ever snapped at someone and regretted it thirty seconds later? That’s an amygdala hijack — a term coined by psychologist Daniel Goleman to describe the moment your brain’s emotional alarm system (the amygdala) overrides your rational thinking (the prefrontal cortex).

In a hijack, your body reacts before your mind consents: heart races, jaw clenches, words fly out unfiltered. It’s built for survival — great for escaping tigers, terrible for handling a tense email or a student talking back in class.

Leadership takeaway: The best leaders don’t suppress this response — they recognize it in real time. The classic fix is the 6-second pause: emotional surges typically dissolve within six seconds if you don’t feed them with more reactive thoughts. Breathe, name the emotion silently (“I’m feeling attacked”), and only then respond. That six-second gap is where leadership actually lives.


2. The Johari Window: Shrinking Your Blind Spot

Popularized by psychologists Joseph Luft and Harry Ingham, the Johari Window splits self-awareness into four quadrants:

  • Open Area — what you know about yourself and others know too
  • Blind Spot — what others see in you that you don’t see yourself
  • Hidden Area — what you know but keep private
  • Unknown Area — what neither you nor others have discovered yet

Most leadership failure lives in the Blind Spot. You think you’re being “direct”; your team experiences you as “dismissive.” You think you’re “hands-off”; your team feels “abandoned.”

Leadership takeaway: Great leaders actively shrink their blind spot by inviting feedback rather than waiting for it. Asking a trusted colleague, “What’s something about how I lead that I might not see?” is uncomfortable — and one of the most powerful growth habits available.


3. SBI Feedback: Feedback Without the Sting

Once you’re gathering feedback (or giving it), how you deliver it matters as much as what you say. The SBI model — Situation, Behavior, Impact — developed by the Center for Creative Leadership, keeps feedback factual instead of accusatory.

  • Situation: “In yesterday’s staff meeting…”
  • Behavior: “…when you interrupted Priya twice while she was presenting her plan…”
  • Impact: “…it seemed to shut down the conversation, and two other people didn’t share their ideas afterward.”

Notice what’s missing: no “you always,” no character judgments, no mind-reading. Just what happened, what was observed, and what it caused.

Leadership takeaway: SBI turns feedback from a personal attack into a shared observation. It’s specific enough to act on and neutral enough that people can actually hear it — instead of getting defensive and triggering their own amygdala hijack.


4. The RAIN Method: Sitting With Difficult Emotions

Borrowed from mindfulness practice (popularized by teacher Tara Brach), RAIN is a four-step method for processing strong emotions instead of being ruled by them:

  • R — Recognize what’s happening (“I’m feeling frustrated right now”)
  • A — Allow the emotion to exist without judging it or pushing it away
  • I — Investigate with curiosity (“Where do I feel this in my body? What triggered it?”)
  • N — Nurture/Non-identification — offer yourself compassion, and remember you are not the emotion; you’re just experiencing it

Leadership takeaway: RAIN is what you practice before you’re in crisis, so that when a hijack hits, you already have a map back to calm. Leaders who regularly use RAIN don’t just manage their emotions better — they model emotional maturity for everyone watching them, which, in any classroom or team, is everyone.


Bringing It Together

These four tools work like a cycle:

RAIN helps you process emotion internally → this prevents the Amygdala Hijack from hijacking your behavior → a calmer mind lets you use the Johari Window to seek honest feedback about your blind spots → and SBI gives you (and others) a clean, non-triggering language to actually deliver that feedback.

Emotional intelligence isn’t a soft skill bolted onto leadership — it is leadership. The tiger in the room is rarely the actual crisis; it’s usually our own unmanaged reaction to it. Master these four tools, and you won’t just lead teams or classrooms more effectively — you’ll lead yourself first.

1 2 3 4 5 6 8